Friday, 22 October 2010

The Five W's of Marketing

By Steve McKee

You've heard of the Five W's: who, what, when, where, and why. They're the elements of information needed to get the full story, whether it's a journalist uncovering a scandal, a detective investigating a crime, or a customer service representative trying to resolve a complaint. There's even an old PR formula that uses the Five W's as a template for how to write a news release.

Most of the time it doesn't matter in what order the information is gathered, as long as all five W's are ultimately addressed. The customer service rep's story may begin with who was offended, while the journalist may follow a lead based on what happened. The detective may start with where a crime was committed while details of who and what (not to mention when and why) are still sketchy.

The Five W's are helpful in marketing planning as well. But unlike in other professions, the development of an effective marketing program requires that they be answered in a specific order: why, who, what, where, and when. The reasons may not be obvious, but by following this pathway you can avoid a great deal of confusion, trial and error, and blind alleys, preserving your company's precious time and resources.

Many marketers instinctively begin with questions about what and where, as in "what" their advertising should say or "where" it should appear. That's what gets them into trouble. They may have some success putting their plans together by relying on intuition and experience, but both can be misleading in a rapidly changing marketing world. These days it's easy for anyone to become confused by (or fall prey to) the latest and greatest trends and tactics.

Smart companies begin by asking "why"—why are we expending our limited resources in marketing? Why do we believe they're better invested here than in other aspects of our business? These questions, properly considered, force company leaders to clearly define their business and marketing objectives and confront their (often unrealized) assumptions before they get too far down the road.

In some cases they may have unrealistic expectations of their marketing efforts. In others, they may be looking to advertising to solve a non-advertising problem. In still others they may be reflexively reacting to a competitor's moves, or to any one of a number of other marketplace or internal dynamics (see "Who's to Blame When Growth Stalls?"). Beginning with the "why" can be challenging, but starting here is critical to ensuring that your subsequent efforts are on target.

The second question is "who"—who is essential to our achieving our goals? To whom should we be directing our message? Whose hearts and minds must we win in order to succeed? The answers to these questions should be derived from the business objectives identified above so that the target audience(s) for your effort are clearly related to them.

For example, a marketing plan meant to generate significant new top-line revenue would likely focus on new customer attraction. An effort that's meant to enhance margins may concentrate on improving your brand's value equation among existing customers. And a plan to enhance your company's price/earnings ratio would focus on prospective investors and industry analysts as its primary target. The better any company defines its "who"—and the more it can know about their lifestyles, behaviors, attitudes, opinions, wants, and needs—the more effectively it can address the remaining three W's.

Next comes "what," as in what it is you need to offer your target audiences in order to accomplish your objectives. This, of course, encompasses a host of business decisions, from product to pricing, policy to packaging, and everything in between. But it is also where key branding issues are addressed, including positioning, differentiation, and a determination of the personality dimensions that are appropriate for both the brand and the task (see "Building a Better Brand").

To be sure, as market conditions and customer needs change, the "what" of your offering will be a continually evolving proposition. But by having a solid understanding of the "who" and "why" of your efforts, you'll be more likely to get, and keep, the "what" right.

Finally, the last two W's can be addressed as you dive into the specifics of campaign planning. The questions now revolve around where and when the best places and times are to communicate your "what" to your "who" in service of your "why." At this stage you'll be required to make many tactical decisions, but if you've effectively addressed the first three W's you'll have the context and perspective you need to make the final two work as hard as possible on your behalf.

In some ways the principles of marketing are simple, but their simplicity can be deceptive. Beneath them often lie hidden complexities that you ignore at your peril. The common way of citing the Five W's—who, what, when, where, and why—rolls off the tongue and is a great mnemonic device. But if you want to optimize your marketing efforts, think why, who, what, where, and when. The order makes all the difference.

Steve McKee is president of McKee Wallwork Cleveland and author of When Growth Stalls: How It Happens, Why You're Stuck, and What to Do About It. Find him on Twitter and LinkedIn.


View the original article here

The Secret to Small Business Tech Support


Ever get that sinking feeling? That pit-of-the-stomach sensation when you know something's gone wrong. Business owners know what I'm talking about. We get it when that customer calls to complain about a job. Or when a supplier's key shipment doesn't arrive on time.


You're a business owner. You know this feeling. When is it the absolute worst? When it's a technology support issue. You come to work and your computer screen is not the way you left it the night before. When you arrive at your office this morning, you're not greeted by the typical desktop. Instead, the screen is frozen at "Windows is starting up." An update that automatically downloaded last night screwed something up. Your screen is black. And now so is your mood.


You watch the screen for a few minutes, waiting for something to happen, but you know nothing will. Finally you restart the computer. Twice. Same result. Now you have that sinking feeling. You see your morning slipping away: This computer isn't going to start. And neither is your day. Until you get some help. You will have to call technical support. But halt your hyperventilation—there's no need to worry at all. As a fellow business owner, I'm going to help you. Because I've learned how to handle technical support with a few rules for people like us.


You can get angry if you live in a city where it snows half the year and your team starts the season 0-4. You can get angry every time you hear that Jennifer Lopez is paid $12 million to be a judge on American Idol. But this time, getting angry won't help anyone. And it won't help you get your issue resolved any quicker. If you're running your own business, the last thing you want is for your employees to see you storming around your office, wildly swinging a golf club over your head like a tomahawk while you kick over your chair and repeatedly yell "Why, why, why!" It's enough that your family's seen this behavior. You must give employees the impression that everything is in control. That YOU are in control. You are a businessman. You are Don Draper. So do what he would do at 8 a.m.—have a bourbon and a smoke. Microsoft (MSFT) Windows never rattled Don Draper, right? So be calm.


Of course it's annoying that you have to wait on hold. And we all realize how aggravating it can be when you have to punch in your "customer ID," ZIP code, mother's maiden name, favorite vacation spot, and social security number into the automated system three times, only to be asked for that same information again the minute a live person comes on the phone. It's not his fault. The technician is just doing his job. He's going to be nice. You need to be nice, too. You're a business owner. How would you like it if some customer was being a jerk to one of your employees? You're not going to get on his good side by being a jerk to him. At best, you'll earn the right to be put on hold five more times than necessary or be forced to sit and wait in silence for many extra minutes, wondering what he's actually doing as he's clicking away on his keyboard.


You know from running your own business that sometimes the answers can't be delivered immediately. Don't you wish your customers would also be a little more patient when they call with a problem? Of course you do. So take a deep breath. Don't worry about those long silences on the line when you think you've been disconnected. He's there. He's probably just mulling things over. Or talking about the issue with his colleagues. Whatever. Be patient. Answer the questions. Take this time to rearrange your schedule. This problem will ultimately get resolved. It's going to just take a little time, that's all. Don't even consider grabbing the golf club again and knocking that picture of your wife and kids at Disney (DIS) off your desk.


View the original article here

Stranded Borrowers: Three Case Studies

By John Tozzi and Bob Ivry

C:\Program

Sally Peterson

While banks insist they're willing to make loans to creditworthy companies, lending to small businesses has dropped by $45 billion since 2008, according to filings with bank regulators. Here are stories of three small business owners who are struggling through the credit crunch.

Jaime Honold, 43
Burgers & Beer
El Centro, Calif.
Revenue: $16 million

A year ago, Jaime Honold (left) wanted to open a fifth Burgers & Beer restaurant. Sales at his 25-year-old chain, which operates in California and Arizona, have been flat or slightly down during the recession. Burgers & Beer is still profitable, Honold says, because it has trimmed expenses. Yet when he asked for a loan to raise the cash for the new outlet, his longtime bank told him to wait because of the uncertain economy, he says. "We want to expand but we can't. They told us it's not about your business. We know you're doing good," Honold says.

Russ Brackett, 61
Video Loft
Boothbay Harbor, Me.
Revenue: $1.2 million

Last December, a month after Russ Brackett opened his second store, he says a local bank froze his $50,000 credit line because regulators had warned the bank that it was undercapitalized. Six other banks turned Brackett down when he tried to replace the credit line and refinance another term loan he had with the same lender, he says. Though Brackett has been in business 26 years and was profitable in 2009, lenders told him he didn't have the collateral or cash flow to support a credit line. In July he got a $35,000 microloan from nonprofit lender CEI. "I'm certainly not the only one in this situation. There's hundreds and hundreds of us," says Brackett. "Unfortunately, a lot of them had to fold."

Dan Larson, 52
HydroSolutions of Duluth
Duluth, Minn.
Revenue: $950,000

HydroSolutions, which manufactures components for small jets and planes, has been unable to finance the metal and plastic it needs to fill new orders. Coming off the eight-employee company's dismal lows of 2009, sales have grown more than sixfold this year, Dan Larson says. He took $100,000 out of his retirement savings last year—paying a 10 percent penalty—to keep the company's doors open. Even though the business has recovered, he can't get a $50,000 line of credit. He says his bank is under pressure from examiners to increase liquidity. "I'm just stymied at this point and not able to add new equipment," says Larson.

Tozzi covers small business for Businessweek.com. Ivry is a reporter for Bloomberg News.


View the original article here

Exporters fear government cuts

Businesses fear the government’s austerity drive will have a devastating effect on industry.

According to the Travelex Confidence Index of 200 exporters, 63 per cent feel spending cuts and tax hikes will have a negative impact on British trade over the long term.

Respondents in the manufacturing sector are concerned that they will be hit hard by the fiscal squeeze, with more than half (53 per cent) saying the measures will have a detrimental effect on the sector.

Only 38 per cent of the total respondents now believe that a weak pound will lead to an export-driven recovery, compared to 53 per cent in June.

The decline in confidence comes despite the recent upbeat figures from the Travelex Confidence Index, where a strong GDP figure in the second quarter had helped to bolster faith in the economic recovery.


View the original article here